I am building a wide case 350 for racing. Can anyone help by suggesting a suitable compression ratio to aim at?
My NC 250 race engines are built with a CR of around 10.25:1 and I measured the current CR on the 350 motor at 11.90:1 which maybe too high. Before I start machining the piston (or adding gaskets/spacers to the cylinder base), does anyone have any comments?
Your input would be much appreciated
Regards
Eric Pritchard
350 Wide Case CR question
Moderator: ajleone
-
- Posts: 2897
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 10:53 am
- Location: Near SE side of Lake Michigan
Re: 350 Wide Case CR question
" I am building a wide case 350 for racing. Can anyone help by suggesting a suitable compression ratio to aim at?
does anyone have any comments? "
____ Sorry I have no idea about that for racing with whatever fuels for such these-days.
__ I've had 13.5:1 -(calculated) in a n-c 350, and obtaining fuel with a high enough octane was always an issue. _ So I'd suggest to be sure to try staying under 12:1.
However, I suggest that you be sure that all CRs are compared by the same CR method, either 'actual' (with calibrated measuring devices), OR 'calculated', CRs.
Hopeful-Cheers,
-Bob
does anyone have any comments? "
____ Sorry I have no idea about that for racing with whatever fuels for such these-days.
__ I've had 13.5:1 -(calculated) in a n-c 350, and obtaining fuel with a high enough octane was always an issue. _ So I'd suggest to be sure to try staying under 12:1.
However, I suggest that you be sure that all CRs are compared by the same CR method, either 'actual' (with calibrated measuring devices), OR 'calculated', CRs.
Hopeful-Cheers,
-Bob
PLEASE NOTE... If this-post is not-yet signed-off with '-Bob', then I'm still in the process of completing it,, and if not also included with 'DCT' near bottom as well, then I may edit this post's wording at a later time. - Dct.Bob
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:50 pm
Re: 350 Wide Case CR question
Thanks for the responce, Bob. Appreciated.
I use the "calibrated measuring" method for calculating the CR's and we have access to 110 octane leaded fuel at the majority of race tracks in the US. Do you think keeping the CR at 11.9:1 will be a problem for the bottom end? (I'm using a Carillo rod). Are there any other downsides?
Regards
Eric Pritchard
I use the "calibrated measuring" method for calculating the CR's and we have access to 110 octane leaded fuel at the majority of race tracks in the US. Do you think keeping the CR at 11.9:1 will be a problem for the bottom end? (I'm using a Carillo rod). Are there any other downsides?
Regards
Eric Pritchard
-
- Posts: 2897
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 10:53 am
- Location: Near SE side of Lake Michigan
Re: 350 Wide Case CR question
" we have access to 110 octane leaded fuel at the majority of race tracks in the US. "
____ 110-octane was not quite good enough for my 13.5-CR. _ Might be okay for 12:1 though.
" Do you think keeping the CR at 11.9:1 will be a problem for the bottom end? "
____ I sure can't think of any reason for why a high-CR would much matter to the bottom-end. _ (Perhaps Eldert knows something of such [?].)
" Are there any other downsides? "
____ Compared to std.CRs, the cyl.head will get hotter and thus be a little tougher on your motor-oil. _ So be sure to use a heavier oil (40 - 50W) which will carry-away more heat.
____ BTW, what piston do you have that it gives you a "calculated" 11.9:1 CR ?
Fun-Cheers,
-Bob
____ 110-octane was not quite good enough for my 13.5-CR. _ Might be okay for 12:1 though.
" Do you think keeping the CR at 11.9:1 will be a problem for the bottom end? "
____ I sure can't think of any reason for why a high-CR would much matter to the bottom-end. _ (Perhaps Eldert knows something of such [?].)
" Are there any other downsides? "
____ Compared to std.CRs, the cyl.head will get hotter and thus be a little tougher on your motor-oil. _ So be sure to use a heavier oil (40 - 50W) which will carry-away more heat.
____ BTW, what piston do you have that it gives you a "calculated" 11.9:1 CR ?
Fun-Cheers,
-Bob
PLEASE NOTE... If this-post is not-yet signed-off with '-Bob', then I'm still in the process of completing it,, and if not also included with 'DCT' near bottom as well, then I may edit this post's wording at a later time. - Dct.Bob
-
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 3:23 pm
- Location: Hazerswoude Rijndijk Netherlands
Re: 350 Wide Case CR question
Hi Eric
i would aim for 11 to 1 . there is almost no HP gain i you go higher.
things only get more critical with octane ratings , ignition settings and jetting
and it looks like the engine will rev better in the upper range with sligtly lower c.r.
i would lower the c.r. by machining the piston crown , by adding spacers under the barrel the squishband wont work
as it should
the bottom end should be no problem , i build 500 Ducatis al the way up to 13 to 1 with no problems
but i lowered the c.r.and the engine runs better
Eldert
i would aim for 11 to 1 . there is almost no HP gain i you go higher.
things only get more critical with octane ratings , ignition settings and jetting
and it looks like the engine will rev better in the upper range with sligtly lower c.r.
i would lower the c.r. by machining the piston crown , by adding spacers under the barrel the squishband wont work
as it should
the bottom end should be no problem , i build 500 Ducatis al the way up to 13 to 1 with no problems
but i lowered the c.r.and the engine runs better
Eldert
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:50 pm
Re: 350 Wide Case CR question
Many thanks for the info. Appreciated.
Regards
Eric
P.S. I'm using a Venolia piston described as 11:1
Regards
Eric
P.S. I'm using a Venolia piston described as 11:1
Return to “Ducati Singles Main Discussions (& How to Join)”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests