[quote= Rocla ...
" I saw this topic is about reduction, so I post again my question (here below) because it is difficult to find any book of specifications...
____ Firstly,, your topic-matter is not very-much related to THIS thread's topic-title, so you ought-to have rather begun a new dedicated thread of your own concerning sprocket-gearing, (instead of clutch-parts quests).
__ Anyhow,, here are a couple other more-related threads in-which you may find at-least one thread-posting of interest...
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=564&p=3574&#p3572 viewtopic.php?f=3&t=26&p=257&#p257 __ If you find something you'd like to follow-up on within either one of those threads, then please respond with your response-post placed within THAT thread (rather than this-one).
" I have a problem of reduction radio : at 5000 t/mn, it seems I am around 95 km/h (59 Miles/h) "
____ Is that while in 5th-gear ?
How did you determine that your speed was 59MPH / 95k/h with your eng.revs at 5000-RPM ?
In order to obtain 59-MPH at 5000-RPM in 5th-gear, you'd need 49/15t sprockets with a rear-wheel circumference of 83.4-inches.
" I have a 15 teeth sprocket at the gear box exit, and a 57 teeth crown on the rear wheel ! "
____ Your 57/15t-gearing -(with resulting ratio of: 3.8:1) is indeed quite low for road-riding (and-so more suitable for off-road/hill-climbing). _ So therefore, you indeed ought to at-least change the rear-sprocket, to a considerably smaller size !
" Does somebody have the same reduction ratio with his 350 (or 250) Ducati ? "
____ Be aware that any motor-model smaller than a 350, does-not have the same primary-ratio, and-thus won't have the same RPM/MPH ratios even with the exact-SAME sized front & rear sprockets !
So INSTEAD of also taking into consideration any "250" model (for comparing to your 350),, rather-instead, consider sprocket-gearing comparisons with 450-models.
__ And BTW, it's quite rather doubtful that you'd find anyone-else who happens to also have a 3.8:1 sprockets-ratio on their 350 or 450 Duke !
" Can somebody tell me the exact speed at 1000 rpm in 5th speed with such ratio 15x57 or with any other ratio in order I recalculate to check if I am wrong or not ? "
____ Most certainly YES ! ... I-myself can check that for you, as gearing-ratio figuring has been one of my FAVORITE-topics (for all OHC Duke-models) !
__ The 350 motor-tran's internally-resulting gear-ratio with 5th-gear engaged is: 2.043:1, so that would make YOUR overall-ratio (in 5th-gear, with 57/15t)= '7.76:1' ! _ Which means your rear-wheel makes 1 complete-turn for every 7&3/4ths crankshaft-rotations.
Next, assuming that your rear-wheel has an average circumference of 83-inches, that would mean that at 1000-RPM, your 350SCR would be rolling-along at about 10.1-MPH.
So-then at 5000-RPM, that ought to be about 81k/h,, (not "95").
" I would like to make sure my calculation is OK before ordering a 16 teeth sprocket and a 40 teeth crown given that I have neither speedometer nor rev control ! "
____ That better-suited combo of sprockets would yield a ratio of 2.5:1, which would result with an overall-ratio of 5.11:1 (in 5th-gear).
So-then at 1000-RPM, your rear-wheel would thus-then rotate 195.7 times per-minute, (or 11742 times per-hour),, and with an averaged-sized rear-tire, that would result with you rolling-along at about 15.4-MPH.
And at 5000-RPM, that would then become near 77-MPH,, (and as I recall a kilometer being 5/8ths of a mile), that speed ought-to convert to 124k/h.
__ Your consideration of a 40t.rear-sprocket is indeed a drastic-reduction, of which itself-alone would raise your overall-gearing by about 30%, which would thusly reduce your engine-revs from 5000-RPM to just 3500 (at the 95km/h *).
This 40/15t.gearing is the stock-gearing for a 350Mark3D and is sufficiently high enough.
If you also go-with a 16t front-sprocket as well, then your overall-gearing would be raised another 7%, (which would lower your eng.revs down-to nearly 3280-RPM, [at the 95km/h*]).
(* These RPM/speed results I've come-up with, [all resulted accordingly with YOUR posted base-line figures], must certainly be pretty-much out-of-line from that which should actually be. _ So now that I've completed my-own calculations, it turns-out that your "95 km/h" at 5000-RPM [with the 57/15t gearing] is about 15% off-from the actual-case.
In-order for BOTH of our posted-figures to be all correct, your 350's rear-wheel circumference would have to be a whopping 96-inches in circumference ! _ And the largest 18in.rear-tire* that I've ever measured, was only nearly 88-inches ! _ So I'm thinking that YOU must've figured something wrongly somehow.
(The smallest 18" tire I've ever measured, was 77-inches.)
____ In-order to properly calculate your eng.RPMs at any particular speed, or vice-versa,, ya first need to know the rolling-circumference of your rear-wheel, and your Duke's overall gear-ratio.
So do you happen to already know the circumference of your read-wheel ?
Hopeful-Cheers,
DCT-Bob